HomeFootballEven if Manchester City's punishment is harsh, the damage will not be compensated: Pochettino
Even if Manchester City's punishment is harsh, the damage will not be compensated: Pochettino
ম্যানচেস্টার সিটির বিরুদ্ধে প্রিমিয়ার Leagueের ১১৫টি অভিযোগের মধ্যে ১১৪টিতে দোষী সাব্যস্ত হওয়ার প্রতিবেদন প্রকাশিত হয়েছে, তবে এই সংখ্যাটি এখনো স্বীকৃত নয়। সিটি সমস্ত অভিযোগ অস্বীকার করেছে এবং আপিলের প্রস্তুতি নিচ্ছে। অভিযোগের সময়কাল ২০০৯-১০ থেকে ২০১৭-১৮ মৌসুম পর্যন্ত। মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের পুরুষ Football দলের Coach মাউরিসিও পোচেতিনো বলেছেন, শাস্তি যতই কঠোর হোক, অতীতের ক্ষতি পূরণ করা সম্ভব নয়। তিনি প্রশ্ন তুলেছেন যে প্রিমিয়ার Leagueের নিয়ন্ত্রণ ব্যবস্থা কোথায় ছিল যখন এসব লেনদেন হচ্ছিল। পোচেতিনো টটেনহ্যাম হটস্পারের অভিজ্ঞতা থেকে বলেছেন, Stadium নির্মাণের সময় প্রায় ১৮ মাস কোনো খেলোয়াড় কেনা হয়নি, অথচ সেই সময় তারা শিরোপার জন্য লড়ছিল। এই তুলনা মামলার মূল কথা তুলে ধরে। শাস্তি হিসাবে জরিমানা বা পয়েন্ট কাটা হতে পারে, কিন্তু এগুলো অতীতের ক্ষতি পূরণ করতে পারে না। প্রিমিয়ার Leagueের সুশাসন এখন একটি সুনির্দিষ্ট পরীক্ষার মুখে। প্রিমিয়ার Leagueের আর্থিক নিয়ম প্রয়োগের ক্ষেত্রে সুশাসনের ওপর নির্ভরশীলতা এখন সবচেয়ে বেশি। পিএসআর এবং এফএফপি এর মতো ব্যবস্থা কার্যকর হলে ক্লাবগুলোর আর্থিক স্থিতিশীলতা নিশ্চিত হবে।
As the Premier League's most significant financial-rule breach case approaches sentencing, Mauricio Pochettino, head coach of the United States men's national team, has raised a simple but weighty question: can the damage of the past truly be repaired, regardless of how harsh the punishment may be? His answer is clear: time cannot be turned back, so justice will never be complete.
This comment is not an alternative to a legal verdict but a reflection of deep frustration. Pochettino asked where the Premier League's control system was when all this was happening? This question strikes not only at the club but at the league's own governance. Drawing from his experience, he noted that during his time at Tottenham Hotspur, no players were signed for approximately 18 months due to stadium construction, even though the team was competing for titles at the time. This comparison reveals the core issue of the case: one club was spending money by violating financial rules, while compliant clubs were denied the same opportunity.
The background of the case requires careful understanding. An independent commission of the Premier League is adjudicating 115 charges against Manchester City, with reports in various media claiming that 114 of them resulted in a guilty verdict. However, this figure has not yet been confirmed, as City has denied all charges and is preparing an appeal. The final punishment has not yet been announced. The allegation period spans from the 2026-10 season to the 2026-18 season, which was the era of City's heaviest investment under Abu Dhabi ownership. There is also a separate charge of failing to cooperate with the investigation from December 2026 to February 2026.
The significance of this case extends beyond the fate of a single club. According to Pochettino's argument, if one club can invest by violating rules, how can compliant clubs remain competitive? This is a problem of distributive inefficiency. In other words, money that was spent in a way other clubs could not access. Penalties such as fines or points deductions may be imposed, but they cannot repair the damage retrospectively. For clubs that lost out despite following the rules, there is no financial compensation or mechanism to review match results.
Pochettino's comments also highlight the failure of the control system. He questioned where the Premier League's controls were when these transactions were taking place over so many years. This question strikes not only at City but at the league's own governance. If the control system had been effective, such a large number of allegations would not have remained unresolved for so long. From this perspective, the case has become a test of the Premier League's governance credibility.
The Premier League's governance is now most dependent on the enforcement of financial rules. Systems such as Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) and Financial Fair Play (FFP) should ensure the financial stability of clubs. However, if there is inconsistency in applying decisions, smaller and independently financed clubs may hesitate to invest. This is a practical concern stemming from Pochettino's own experience, as he has worked at an independently financed club.
Pochettino is currently serving as the head coach of a national team, so his comments are not influenced by any club-related interests. This position has given him the freedom to express his views independently. His sharp criticism is rooted in his experience at club level, which is far more practical than abstract discussion. Although his remarks may be controversial, they raise an important question about the Premier League's governance.
The final outcome of the case remains uncertain. City is appealing, and the punishment has not yet been announced. However, Pochettino's argument that no punishment can repair the damage is a long-term truth. The Premier League's governance is now facing a specific test. If the control system is effective, the likelihood of such incidents recurring will decrease. But if the control system remains weak, the risk of financial rule violations will become multifaceted.
Pochettino's comment is not only against one club but is a call against the governance of the entire league. Time cannot be turned back, so justice will never be complete. However, to avoid such situations in the future, the control system must be strengthened. This is Pochettino's main message, and it points to a clear path ahead for the Premier League.

Related Players
Recommended
£5,000 an Hour: The Legal-Cost Codebook Behind Manchester City's Financial Rules Case2026-09-26
Bandung to Jakarta: Vietnam's 72-Hour Ledger and the Wound on a Goalkeeper's Arm2026-09-30
No Handshake, Three Goals in 12 Minutes: Testing Football's Codebook in Debrecen's Silent Stadium2026-09-29
An Immutable Error On-Chain: How a Mexico City Animal-Rescue Report Slid Into a Football Analysis Pipeline2026-09-26
Wrong Label, Dead Analysis: Reading a Crime Report Tagged as Football2026-09-26
Turkey 1-4 Italy: Where the ‘Forget It Quickly’ Message Buries the Rulebook Arithmetic2026-09-29
The Silence in the Octagon: The Question Nobody Asked After UFC Vegas 1212026-09-29
Bruno Fernandes, a Broken Byline, and the Risk Ledger of Two Teams2026-09-28
Recommended
Liga MX After the Break: What the Calendar, Fixtures and Pitch Stories Say Before the Restart2026-09-30
From Octagon to Stretcher: At UFC Vegas 121 the Knockout Was Not the Story, the Silence of the Medical Protocol Was2026-09-28
FIFA's $21.1 Billion Distribution Plan: The Economic War That Could Reshape Football Politics2026-09-30
Liverpool's 'Huge Swoop' — Whose Dream Is It Really? The Game Behind 17-Year-Old Mora2026-09-30
That Night at Camp Nou: Feyenoord's €74,375 Fine and a Two-Year Suspended Sanction2026-09-28
Even if Manchester City's punishment is harsh, the damage will not be compensated: Pochettino2026-09-30
